AGL 40.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 129.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-0.36%)
BOP 6.75 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.05%)
CNERGY 4.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-3.02%)
DCL 8.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-4.36%)
DFML 40.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.87 (-2.09%)
DGKC 80.96 Decreased By ▼ -2.81 (-3.35%)
FCCL 32.77 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFBL 74.43 Decreased By ▼ -1.04 (-1.38%)
FFL 11.74 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (2.35%)
HUBC 109.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.97 (-0.88%)
HUMNL 13.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.81 (-5.56%)
KEL 5.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.48%)
KOSM 7.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.68 (-8.1%)
MLCF 38.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.19 (-2.99%)
NBP 63.51 Increased By ▲ 3.22 (5.34%)
OGDC 194.69 Decreased By ▼ -4.97 (-2.49%)
PAEL 25.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.94 (-3.53%)
PIBTL 7.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-3.52%)
PPL 155.45 Decreased By ▼ -2.47 (-1.56%)
PRL 25.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.94 (-3.52%)
PTC 17.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.96 (-5.2%)
SEARL 78.65 Decreased By ▼ -3.79 (-4.6%)
TELE 7.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-5.42%)
TOMCL 33.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.78 (-2.26%)
TPLP 8.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-7.28%)
TREET 16.27 Decreased By ▼ -1.20 (-6.87%)
TRG 58.22 Decreased By ▼ -3.10 (-5.06%)
UNITY 27.49 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.22%)
WTL 1.39 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.72%)
BR100 10,445 Increased By 38.5 (0.37%)
BR30 31,189 Decreased By -523.9 (-1.65%)
KSE100 97,798 Increased By 469.8 (0.48%)
KSE30 30,481 Increased By 288.3 (0.95%)

Let us see how far is the brave Parliamentary Resolution for a review of our policy on the "war against terrorism" and other related matters, is allowed to make progress, especially after its subsequent reinforcement by a Senate resolution.
It is a pity that President Zardari and Prime Minister Gilani, just as Musharraf before them, have already committed the country to be America's partner in its "war against terror" and have repeatedly, during their visits to that country, and on several other occasions, owned up the war as "our own war" in parrot-like reiteration.
Thus there is much to repudiate and a great deal to live down, before our policy can change tracks. As for America, it has made its "point of view" abundantly clear by a missile attack on our soil on the very day the Parliament passed its resolution pledging to protect the country's sovereignty and asking the government to "repel" armed intrusions into the country.
One cannot forget that there was a similar attack on our soil during our President's visit to America during which President Zardari expressed his appreciation (how out of synch one can get?) of America's help in Pakistan's war against terror. The attacks have continued relentlessly despite all and even after the President and the Prime Minister have (at last, belatedly) spoken unequivocally against them.
Ever since one can remember, whenever there was any move for a dialogue with the "Taliban" or "militants" or "miscreants" or "terrorists" or "extremists" (take your choice), there were immediate rumblings of strong protest and reproach from Condoleezza Rice, or Robert Gates (Secretary of State of USA and her deputy, respectively), among other functionaries of the US Government.
"How can you talk to people who should be fought against and eliminated" they questioned and chided in effect. Several times the dialogue process got off to a promising start and a welcome and promising lull in suicide attack and assaults on military check-posts was seen.
Especially following elections in the country and formation of a civilian government and a strong initiative by the ANP government in the NWFP, there was a cessation of hostilities which lasted the best part of two months. But then, inexplicably, things started to go sour. Attacks, of all the people, on ANP leaders and ANP government which had started the reconciliation process, can only be interpreted as a master stroke of sabotage activity.
From past experience we can at least strongly suspect that FBI and CIA of America, through overt and covert activities, directly and through paid agents and mercenaries, are busy over time to kill any move towards reconciliation between Taliban and many other disparate groups on the one hand and the Government of Pakistan on the other. This is no idle conjecture.
Students of political upheavals in Iran, for example, will recall how, over a quarter of a century ago, street demonstrations in support of popularly elected Prime Minister Mossadegh (who was to be punished for nationalising the Anglo Iranian Oil Company) were brutally put down and disrupted by muscle men in the pay of CIA, so that the increasingly unpopular Shah could continue his brutal reign.
These admissions were made in a documentary "The End of An Empire" produced in the West, which has a tradition of clearing its conscience by admitting to its misdeeds thirty or forty years after its illegal and immoral deeds have served their momentary purpose!
IPI PIPELINE - THE SPANNER IN THE WORKS!Another area in which America is playing the role of Pakistan's arch-enemy is the proposed IPI pipeline project which is to bring Iran's surplus gas to Pakistan and possibly onwards to India for the two energy-starved countries. Its implementation could be an ideal, cost-effective solution to Pakistan's desperate need for energy in a relatively short time frame.
Talks on a pipeline from Iran across Balochistan in Pakistan and then on to India (IPI) have been going on since the mid nineties ie for over a decade now, but have remained inconclusive. America has been strongly opposed to the project as part of its policy of trying to isolate Iran, which country (under Israel's relentless pressure and all-encompassing influence) it keeps at the top of its hate list.
America is bothered that a pipeline to Pakistan and India from Iran would not only bring income to Iran but also create a bond between the three countries which runs counter to American (read Israeli) policy of isolating Iran. Parallel with its opposition to the IPI pipeline America has been trying to persuade Pakistan to go for other options for its desperate energy needs.
One such option, the Turkmen-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India pipeline project (TAPI), has moved much faster than IPI despite being less feasible from Pakistan's point of view than the IPI project. Faced with its desperate need for energy Pakistan appeared at one time to have resolved to brave America's displeasure and to finally move decisively on this much delayed project as well.
Accordingly, in April 08 Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad made a stopover visit to Pakistan and had high profile meetings with our president and prime minister. The visit it was thought, had removed any existing hitches in the IPI agreement, allowing the highly feasible project to be launched in 2009 and gas from Iran to be on tap in Pakistan in 2012. All this appears to have been put on the back-burner, for now.
Not surprisingly ADB is agreeable to financing the TAPI project but for financing the IPI project Pakistan and Iran must fend for themselves. The long hand of America is also seen at work in this difficulty. None of the major financial institutions in the world can move without America's approval.
WILLY-NILLY TO IMF, HANDS AND FEET BOUND At one time in the not-too-distant-past we celebrated our "escape" from the need to go to IMF. And now IMF is being approached as the court of last resort to help us get back from the default precipice. There is much confusion about IMF's potential for help or harm to Pakistan. Some herald it as the savior and a panacea to all our current financial problems, while others see it as harbinger of disaster for a great majority of the people of Pakistan.
While some of the conditionalities of IMF may be considered to be bitter medicine - painful but necessary for putting a belated check on the free spending habits, luxurious life styles and corruption of our ruling classes, past and present - the one calling for end to subsidies will bring misery to a large section of our population and could lead to large scale riots, a "trailer" of which was seen only recently across the country in several cities when power rates were raised while load-shedding was rampant.
Our failure lies in our inability to communicate to our friends in the West (assuming we can give them the benefit of doubt) that unlike in their countries, poor and unemployed people in Pakistan and other developing countries do not have the luxury of hefty social welfare payments to cushion the impact of abolition of subsidies.
Withdrawal of subsidies on power, gas and food items at this time would be a cruel, unacceptable step which has the potential to tear the fabric of our society through violent, spontaneous, uncontrolled protests. Unfortunately the "Friends of Pakistan" club, the World Bank, ADB, Saudi Arabia and others will not give us any help in cash or kind till IMF gives its nod.
If President Zardari had any hope that Pakistan's senior partner on the war against terror would bail it out in this time of distress, such hopes were dashed. Just look at America's hypocrisy and double standards.
Only recently Sarah Palin the Vice Presidential candidate had to face charges that as Governor of Alaska "she charged the state for her children to travel with her, including to events where they were not invited, and later amended expense reports to specify that they were on official business", in all a matter of $21,012.
It is the same America whose government under Bush brokered the NRO deal between Musharraf and the present rulers, which allowed corrupt people in the country to go scot-free with their alleged loot running into billions of Dollars! And now America treads the high ground in administering IMF's bitter medicine to us.
([email protected])

Copyright Business Recorder, 2008

Comments

Comments are closed.